FACTS: Here is Eritrea report’s critics

Several experts are skeptical about the conclusions of the Danish asylum report on Eritrea.

Danish Immigration Service report on Eritrea gets hug from several experts and professionals.

Here are some of them:

* Jens Weise Olesen, senior consultant at the Danish Immigration Service to TV2:

– It’s a torpedo directly into the work we have done over 20 years to build credibility and transparency.

* Tamrat Kebebe, director of grassroots organization Inter Africa Group and the source of the report:

– The conclusion has been reached to / have constructed does not reflect my point of view. In fact, the situation in Eritrea considered, I find it inhumane. It is achieved by deliberately distort and tailor my statements.

* Professor at London South Bank University and the source of the report, Gaim Kibreab:

– I would dump the report if it was a first-year student who had handed it to me.

* Carl Bexelius, deputy head of legal affairs at the Swedish Migration Board:

– The report provides a picture of the situation in Eritrea, which is better than it in fact is the case. It is simply misleading.

* Dan Connell, a professor and lecturer in African politics at Simmons College in Boston. Has worked with Eritrea for 40 years. Politiken:

– It is a sloppy report appears to be designed for use political rather than to explore a subject. It is wrong absurdly on several points.

* Report from the United Kingdom announced in November, according to Politiken:

– The government (in Eritrea, ed.), People regard as political opponents if they deserting or evading military service, and treatment of these people will probably lead to prosecution.

* Sheila B. Keetharuth, UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Eritrea, in a speech, according to Berlingske:

– Eritreans flee forced conscription indefinitely, arbitrary arrests and imprisonment, solitary confinement, inhumane prison conditions, killings, disappearances and torture.

* David Bozzini, a visiting scientist at the City University of New York and internationally recognized Eritrea expert, Berlingske:

– The report from the Danish immigration authorities is a perfect example of how such reports should not be. It is biased and colored.

* Secretary General of the Danish Refugee Council, Andreas Kamm, on Twitter:

– Immigration should withdraw the report on Eritrea back and rethink the whole concept. One must be able to trust the authorities.

* Claus Juul, Legal Adviser at Amnesty International:

– One can begin to process the files (for asylum seekers from Eritrea, ed.) Now, but we do not believe that it could incorporate the report of the proceedings as it looks.

* Anne Mette Kjær, researcher in African politics and government feeling at Aarhus University:

– According to my assessment holds premise of the report – that there is a lack of new information on the state of Eritrea – not. There are lots of sources, including credible sources.

Political majority will examine justice ministers in Eritrea case

Parliament calls for investigation of Attorney Frederiksen and predecessor Hækkerups share in Eritrea case.

Right now requires an examination of the Justice Minister Mette Frederiksen (S) and her predecessor Karen Haekkerup (S) involvement in the so-called Eritrea-case.

The proposal meets the backing of a political majority consisting of Unity, SF and the Danish People’s Party, writes Berlingske Monday.

Frederiksen claimed Friday Immigration a statement on Eritrea report, but a majority in Parliament considers that there should also focus on the two successive Ministers of Justice responsibility in the matter.

Read also left wants Ombudsman into Eritrea case

– That’s fine with a statement from the Danish Immigration Service, but we also want an explanation of the minister’s role. The minister is trying to do this for all sorts of other people’s problem. She must take political responsibility themselves.

– It is Mette Frederiksen, who has approved the report and praised it in a press release. Therefore we charge the Minister a statement, said Liberal spokesman, Karsten Lauritzen, Berlingske.

Professor pulled quotes back

It all started last weekend, when Professor Gaim Kibreab, the only named source in the report of the Danish Immigration Service, withdrew from the report because he felt betrayed and abused by the Danish officials.

Read also the Parliamentary Ombudsman man contemplating going into the Eritrea-case

The report was prepared by the Immigration Service on the basis of a so-called fact-finding mission to the East African country to investigate the security situation.

Specifically, the report noted that it is no longer risky for people of Eritrea to escape from the country’s so-called national service, which is a mixture of military service and work for the state and the government.

Political bestilingsarbejde?

The report’s conclusion means in practice that a number of asylum seekers can be sent from Denmark to Eritrea without endangering their lives.

– There is no doubt that it would be appropriate to have a detailed knowledge of how this case has been handled in the ministry, says foreigners spokesman Karina Lorentzen (SF).

Also read Justice requires statement on Eritrea-report

She points out that there are now suspicions that the Immigration Service has attempted to provide what the government wanted, writes Berlingske.

Neither Immigration or Justice Minister Mette Frederiksen has returned to the newspaper’s inquiries Sunday.

 

 

 

Landings, arrested 11 ”jackals” ”Group of the most dangerous”

CATANIA – ”It ’a despicable traffic”. The words of the prosecutor of Catania Giovanni Salvi crystallize the abomination of what emerged from the operation conducted by the Flying Squad and the Sco Rome that led to bring to justice the alleged leaders of the transnational organization that traffics in human beings and profiting unlawfully flows from North Africa to Sicily. The headquarters would be in Libya, and the criminal group, would also be the one that would leave the boat then sank in the Strait of Sicily between 27 and 28 June, killing at least 244 people.

Tokhla, jackal in Italian, is the name of the operation that led to the arrest of 11 people in Italy and Germany. The collaboration with the German police who brought to justice one of the organization’s criminal minds, Measho Tesfamariam, 29, arrested yesterday in Muncheberg, a German national. Him and his role apical had already talked about the Espresso and Future with the investigations which have brought to light the tragedy of June. A fact already emerged from the investigation of Mobile games last May, when the ship arrived in Catania Grecale carrying 17 corpses, in addition to 206 migrants. The Eritrean was under wiretap and in several conversations referred to sinking. Then the pieces of the puzzle have been reconstructed by the police who requested his arrest. Tesfamariam understood to be picked up by investigators and, in fact, goes so far as to shut down for a certain period of time his phone number to which several relatives of the victims were trying to contact him for news of their relatives. Caution useless his trip to Germany ended with the handcuffs.

The police place detained nine other people between Sicily and northern Italy. In Milan Abdullatif Mohamed, 26, Mahmud Seid Mahamud Kar, 28, in Monza Kibrom Khasay, 24, in Rome Omar Ebrahim, Marsala Kibrom Khasay, 28 years. The others have ended up in the police net in Catania and Filipos Abraha, of 19 years, Ali Abdallah Mahammed, 24, Provide Omer Ibrahim, 19, and Efrem Goitom, 18 years.

Between May and September, the organization would organize at least 23 crossings. The investigation leads to this count: with a ticket payment that ”hovers .- says Andrea Bonomo pm – between 2000 and $ 3000.” ”Our goal – added the prosecutor Giovanni Salvi – is to ensure over the reception of migrants also to target criminal organizations to the heart.” The chief prosecutor etnea points out, even if there is a suspicion that this is the group that caused the sinking of the barge in late June, to not arrested are accused of murder.

”This organization is among the most dangerous working in human trafficking. – Says Vincenzo Nicolì SCO Rome – E ’a transnational network that operates a logistics base in Libya where people are picked and whole families from the area sub- Saharan Africa. From there they are taken on dilapidated boats and then once you are in Italy, is ready for another network that takes care of their transfer in northern Europe, and between these goals is especially Germany. ”

Rome, Monza and Catania are the logistics bases located by police. A proof that the capital Etna plays a strategic role in the migration offense run by the organization and that today the execution of stop police discovered that a building on Via Di Prima, in the heart of San Beryl, had been turned into a hiding for migrants waiting to be transferred. In an attic were ”prisoners” 9 Somalis, including eight minors aged between 14 and 16 years. ”We think there were at least two days.” – Says the manager of the Mobile Salvago Antonio. The youngsters had been locked in the house waiting for the relatives inviassero the necessary documents for the trip to Northern Europe. After the gruesome discovery, police arrested the tenant of the apartment, Andemeriam Yemane, 26, accused of kidnapping and abetting illegal stay.

© RIPRODUZIONE RISERVATA

Swedish legal expert on Danish Eritrea-report: Misleading

The Danish Eritrea-report do not give a true picture of the situation in the country, says Swedish legal expert.

Danish Immigration Eritrea-report is misleading because you have not been critical and wide enough in his use of sources.

How is the criticism from Carl Bexelius who is deputy head of legal affairs at the Swedish Migration Board, which corresponds to the Danish Immigration Board. Sweden has also seen a large influx of refugees from Eritrea over the past year.

Monday struck the Danish report a large bump on the road since the report only named source, the English professor Gaim Kibreab, decided to withdraw his name from the report.

Eritrea is located in the northern part of East Africa with coast along the Red Sea and bordering Ethiopia, Sudan and Djibouti.

The country has, according to the World Bank about six million people – however, figures are highly uncertain, as no action is taken censuses.

Previously an Italian colony and was in 1952 annexed by Ethiopia. Fought against them a war of independence from 1961 to 1991. Sidener mode between the two countries described as ’no war and no peace’.

Eritrea is one of the world’s poorest countries and is located at the bottom – in North Korea – in the list of world countries degree of freedom of the press.

He believes that he has been misquoted in the report and that his opinions have been put together with the report’s anonymous sources to reinforce their views.

See also Immigration call Swedish Eritrea-criticism unserious

Not proper sources

Now the report again criticized – this time from the Swedish side.

– The report provides a picture of the situation in Eritrea, which is better than it in fact is the case. It is simply misleading, says Carl Bexelius.

He does not believe that the Danish Immigration Board has been good enough in their choice of sources, which results in the report being untrustworthy.

– There are problems with the sources that the report makes use of. A report like this needs a wide variety of sources that can give a picture of the whole situation in the country.

– This report has placed much emphasis on the opinions of the embassy and diplomats who do not have access to first hand information.

Also read the British report: objectors and deserters from Eritrea face persecution

– When you do a study like this, you need addressing, for example, the government and NGOs. They have important information and experiences that you need, says Carl Bexelius.

Do not recommend return ticket

In Sweden they are of the opinion that it is not safe to send deserters and conscientious returned to Eritrea as refugees at risk of imprisonment and torture.

– We are of the opinion that you can not return to Eritrea without risking consequences. Therefore, we give asylum to between 98 and 100 percent of all refugees from Eritrea, and we do not recommend people to take back, says Carl Bexelius.

See also Amnesty: Eritrea report to be withdrawn

Tuesday, the Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt (S) in the Parliamentary question time once the defense Immigration Service report.

Here the prime minister said that she did not want to go into each country’s conclusions on the situation in Eritrea and that she is satisfied that the Immigration Service has examined the situation in the country.
 

 

The Eritrean regime is very happy with Denmark

 
“This is the answer we want – we just need someone to do the ‘research’ to say it”, seems the terms of reference of the anonymous researchers of the Danish Immigration Service (DIS), who last week published a very controversial report under the title: “Eritrea – Drivers and Root Causes of Emigration, National Service and the Possibility of Return”.
 
The anonymous researchers spent two weeks in Eritrea and spoke with 12 anonymous sources. Nine of these are international organisations, of which five are Western embassies.
 
The remaining three sources are one “regional NGO based in Asmara”, a representative of the Eritrean Foreign Ministry and a “well-known Eritrean-intellectual”; all of them anonymous, which makes it extremely difficult to check the sources.
 
 
Seemingly it was not important for the researchers to talk to the Eritrean people and their religious leaders, who recently published critical letters about the dire situation in the country and the mass exodus of the youth.  All serious Danish and European institutions should reject this unworthy report and demand a parliamentary hearing on the Eritrean issue and how this research was conducted. The Danish people and the Eritrean refugees deserve it.
 
The researchers, whom haven’t returned the numerous messages I have left at DIS, also visited Ethiopia, where they spoke with eight sources, of which all but one are anonymous. Outside Africa they spoke only with one person, Professor Gaim Kibreab, an expert on refugees and Eritrea from London South Bank University, who after reading the final report disassociated himself immediately and denounced the report as inaccurate. Unlike the DIS-researchers, Kibreab responded immediately: “the report is cherry-picking with Danish interest” to bar Eritrean refugees from entering Europe.
 
 
Serious research builds, albeit critically, on other previous articles, reports, books and audio-visual sources. The DIS report disqualifies all reports of international institutions like those of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch – not to mention the reports of journalists, academicians and various governments – as not trustworthy.
 
The report discredits all aforementioned reports including the stories of refugees who arrived in Europe/Denmark with scars of oppression and persecution on their body and psyche as “not relevant for the Danish caseload”. The report fails to explain what is relevant for the “Danish caseload”, but it is obvious from the tone and substance of the document that the Danish government wants to wriggle out of the 1951 Geneva Convention, which defines a refugee as someone who ”owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country or return there because there is a fear of persecution.”
 
The DIS researchers seem to be overwhelmed by the hospitality availed to them by the totalitarian Eritrean regime, which has no functioning parliament, no constitution, no independent judiciary and no elections for the last 23 years. The interest of DIS to bar Eritrean refugees from its territory and the Eritrean regime’s interest for propaganda conflated. No wonder the Eritrean regime and its media outlets received the report with jubilation. The Danish report is now being used to vindicate the Eritrean regime and to discredit the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights violations in Eritrea and the UN Commission of Enquiry on human rights violations in Eritrea.
 
Serious researchers and journalists who spend two weeks in a country like Eritrea don’t only talk to anonymous sources from the Eritrean government and Western embassies – they also approach taxi drivers, speak to people in confidential places and hold talks with more than one “well-known Eritrean intellectual”. They can’t talk with independent journalists, however, because there are none left in Eritrea after they were either arrested or exiled.
 
The researchers have the audacity to talk about regional NGOs in the country without mentioning the name of either the organisation or the spokesperson. The Eritrean regime has its own NGOs like the National Union of Eritrean Women (NUEW), the National Union of Eritrean Youth (NUEY) and The Peacebuilding Centre for the Horn of Africa (PCHA) – all are set up by the regime to deceive the international community. The researchers write without any criticism what one of these “governmental NGOs” told them : “A regional NGO based in Asmara emphasised that ‘Sawa is not a military camp but is basically the final two years of high school. There are academic classes, some physical training, marching but no weapons training as such’.” Serious researchers would confront this statement with government films of Sawa inaugurations, easily found online.
 
The Danish parliament should summon the responsible minister who is responsible for this flimsy and harmful report and should organise a hearing where all stakeholders, including Professor Kibreab and representatives of the Eritrean government are present. Facts should be unearthed in a transparent exchange of information from various sources, so that Denmark can remain a heaven for genuine refugees. The Danish and other European government should not target the refugees who went through a hell to reach a save heaven. They should develop a common policy that helps to change the situation in Eritrea. Eritreans are in search of liberty. They don’t want to leave their country. They want to study, work and help their family.
 
The Eritrean regime has been profiting from the exodus because Eritrean refugees have been sending remittances to their families. Eritrean regime agents have also been visiting refugee camps to convince Eritrean refugees to sign “apology letters” at the Eritrean Embassies and pay a monthly two percent fee from their income. Those who comply with this can travel to Eritrea even if they don’t have, in this case, the Danish passport. With the DIS report, the Danish government is allowing the Eritrean regime to not only control the lives of Eritreans inside Eritrea, but also here in Denmark and other parts of Europe.