We do not want ”FESTIVAL OF FEAR” – Klaus-Dieter Grothe

logo-nselamplay

Watch Video Here

Ironically, in Giessen, where every year thousands of people seek shelter and safety from the inhuman dictatorship in Eritrea, organized this regime a festival on July 4th and 5th. The government thus overrides the decision of the City Council, which has called this festival ”not desirable in casting” as. The many refugees will be shown on the part of the regime that they are also in Germany under surveillance, they should continue to be afraid.

 

Around »Eritrea Festival in Giessen” this time no violence

”Down with the dictator,” demonstrators shouted. Such a festival just in Giessen, where hundreds of refugees and asylum seek refuge in front of the Eritrean regime, they condemned as a ”provocation”. The festival spread fear among the refugees. In recent years, there had been several times to violent clashes between visitors of the festival and Eritrean opposition. This weekend, a confrontation did not happen.

”Giessen is a place of freedom”, held the parliamentary leader of the Greens in the city council, Klaus-Dieter Grothe, fixed in a rally in front of the town hall. Therefore, there is no place for a ”Festival of Fear”. Grothe was next to representatives of three organizations for a democratic and free Eritrea notifying the demonstration. The Green Party cited a report published in June a commission of inquiry by the UN Human Rights Council on the current situation in Eritrea in his speech. The document accuses the East African regime systematic torture, forced labor and arbitrary executions that meet the ”offense of crimes against humanity” could. ”The regime murdered and raped,” Grothe is summoned to the UN report. A ”Eritrea Festival” must be located in Giessen therefore ’not put up with ”.

”Propagandists” undesirable

Also the Giessen SPD chairman and Member of Parliament Gerhard Merz, who recalled the appeal made by the city council three years ago to prevent events such as the ”Eritrea Festival” in the future Hessenhallen participated in the rally in front of City Hall. ”Propagandists of the regime are not welcome here,” said Merz. Mayor Gerda Weigel Greilich addressed in a speech, meanwhile, to the Eritrean refugees, which the city ”wants to offer a good stay” as well as language courses and training opportunities. The aim was that the refugees return in the future to their homes ”and there can build a democracy with. For that we want to create the conditions with here, ”In another speech of living in the US exile Eritreans called Dr. Russom Mesfun: task must be to the Eritrean regime». To eliminate by peaceful means ”.

The 150 demonstrators moved from the Town Hall over the road to the Hessian Rödgener initial reception. On banners, they demanded freedom for political prisoners, complained persecution and torture and called to commemorate the victims of the Eritrean Government. In addition, a symbolic action, they gathered at the suggestion Grothe waste a – ”as a thank you to the city,” and the decision of the city council against the ”Eritrea Festival”.

Before the Hessenhallen held on Saturday afternoon 30 oppositionists a vigil. That it came to no aggressive confrontations like in the past, evaluate the demonstrators as a success of their ”peaceful protests”.

Inside, the guests danced to songs meanwhile known Eritrean musicians like Melekin Atombes, Henok Teklay and Isaias Debesay. Among the guests was also Osman Saleh Mohammed, the Eritrean Government has been committed since gaining independence in 1993 – first as a minister of education, since 2007 as foreign minister. Eritrea is a free country, he said in brief conversation with the Allgemeine Zeitung. Who say the opposite, pursuing propaganda or have never visited the country.

Foster refugees thriving with love, support from American parents

logo-nselamplay

watch the video here

SALT LAKE CITY — It is one of the most vulnerable populations in our country: refugees under the age of 18 who fled to the U.S. without their parents. Over 70 of those children now call Utah home. Here, the foster refugees are thriving with the love and support of their American parents.

Laura and Tim Giles of Utah are foster parents to two boys from Eritrea, a country in the horn of Africa bordered by Ethiopia, Sudan and Djibouti. Sixteen-year-old Salih and 18-year-old Anwet fled the violence in Eritrea but had to leave their parents behind.

”They have families who love them and they had to leave their families and so we just wanted to become an American family to them,” Laura Giles said.

Through an interpreter, Anwet tells us that they miss their home and families, but he says, ”human rights are not protected. There is no freedom in Eritrea.”

Conditions in the Ethiopian refugee camp where Anwet was tortured were just as frightening. ”It’s tough to hear the stories,” Tim Giles said.

Late last year, both boys landed in Utah. They spoke no English, were alone and in search of love and support when they found the Giles.

I asked Anwet and Salih how it felt to find a loving family here in Utah? Anwet replied saying, ”God actually sent this family for us.” The Giles were happy to open their home to these boys.

”No matter where you are in the world, kids are kids and they enjoy having a good time, they want to be loved and I think those are sort of the two things we try to provide,” Tim Giles said.

It’s obvious there is a lot of love and laughter in the home. The boys are also learning English. But for now, Laura Giles says that ”even though there is a language barrier with us, you can totally know their personalities.”

Laura Giles describes Anwet as ”a little more serious-minded, very mature, very responsible, very helpful and kind.” Meanwhile, she says, ”Salih is very fun-loving; he’s a jokester.”

 

UK: Flawed Policy on Eritrean Refugee Claims

(London, July 2, 2015) – The United Kingdom’s Home Office should issue new guidance to staff screening Eritrean refugee claims that reflects the continued real risk of persecution and other abuses there, Human Rights Watch said today in a letter to the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration.

Three key changes to recent Home Office asylum guidance on Eritrean asylum claims are based exclusively on a flawed Danish report that suggests there have been improvements in the human rights situation in Eritrea and on statements by Eritrean government officials. But the most up-to-date evidence, including a June 2015 UN Commission of Inquiry report and recent Human Rights Watch interviews with Eritreans who have fled the country, indicates that long-standing abuses continue.

“The reliance on a weak and discredited report suggests the Home Office is more interested in keeping asylum seekers out than in protecting people in danger,” said Gerry Simpson, senior refugee researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of relying on Eritrean government ‘plans’ to end decades of human rights abuse, the UK should draw on current independent evidence of repression to assess Eritreans’ refugee claims.”

The UK’s new guidance could lead decision-makers to erroneously dismiss Eritreans’ genuine protection claims stemming from draft evasion and desertion, the harsh conditions of prolonged national service, or from punishment for leaving Eritrea without permission.

Deporting such people would amount to refoulement, the forced return of a person to a place where they would face a real risk of persecution or other serious harm, Human Rights Watch said.

The number of Eritreans arriving in Europe and lodging asylum claims increased dramatically in 2014, when 44,600 applied, compared with 14,580 in 2013 and 6,400 in 2012. Almost all arrived by boat from Libya.

The vast majority of those lodging asylum claims in 2014 did so in Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland, with much lower numbers in the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Malta, and the UK, where 3,280 people registered claims. A chief immigration adviser at the Danish Immigration Service who co-authored the Danish report has said that the report was hastily produced in response to the increasing numbers of Eritreans lodging claims in Denmark in 2014. By the end of the year, 2,275 had registered in Denmark.

In line with global refugee recognition statistics for Eritreans in recent years, 89 percent of the 15,900 Eritrean asylum seekers whose cases were resolved in the EU in 2014 received some kind of protected status. Sixty percent received refugee status and 27 percent received subsidiary protected status based on human rights grounds.

Eritrea was one of eight African countries that met with EU member states in November 2014 as part of the EU-Horn of Africa Migration Route Initiative, also known as the Khartoum Process. Its stated aim is to stop trafficking and smuggling of migrants from the Horn of Africa to Europe. The change in the UK policy probably stemmed from this effort along with the increasing number of Eritreans arriving in the UK, Human Rights Watch said.

Between January 1 and the end of March 2015, record numbers of Eritreans – 3,552 – lodged asylum claims in the UK, according to the Home Office.

In March, the Home Office published two reports on Eritrea announcing key changes in guidance for reviewing Eritrean asylum claims. The reports say that the Eritrean authorities no longer view draft evaders or deserters as traitors or political opponents, that they and others leaving Eritrea without permission no longer automatically risk persecution or other harm on return, and that not all military service conscripts face abuse.

The changes are based almost exclusively on the discredited December 2014 Danish Immigration Service report, which suggests that the Eritrean government may be carrying out reforms that would allow Eritrean asylum seekers fleeing Eritrea’s abusive, indefinite national conscription program to be safely returned to the country.

However, the conclusions in the Danish report are based mostly on interviews with members of the diplomatic community in Asmara who have limited ability to speak freely to people in Eritrea and who qualified their statements, including by saying that the fate of people returned to Eritrea is unclear, and that government reforms of the national service conscription are rumoured, but not confirmed. No independent human rights investigators – including members of the UN Commission of Inquiry – have been able to investigate the situation in Eritrea.

Western diplomats have also openly told visiting Norwegian immigration experts that what they can say about human rights conditions in Eritrea amounts to little more than “views and … speculation.”

The UK report also says Eritrean government officials’ claim they plan to limit national service to 18 months. The authorities had made similar announcements previously, but there is no evidence they have made these changes on the ground. 

In December, the UN refugee agency criticized the Danish report on a number of grounds, including that interviewees’ information had “often been used selectively in the report.”

These and other concerns undermine the Danish report’s two key conclusions, Human Rights Watch said. The report says that anyone leaving Eritrea illegally, including draft evaders, can safely return if they pay a 2 percent diaspora tax and sign a letter of apology at any Eritrean Embassy worldwide for having left the country illegally, and that draft evaders and deserters are no longer considered by the Eritrean regime to be traitors or political opponents.

On June 29, the UK’s Independent Advisory Group on Country Information (IAGCI) – which makes recommendations to the UK’s Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration about the content of material produced by the Home Office’s Country of Origin Information Servicepublished its criticism of the Home Office reports, which it said were “marred by serious methodological concerns.”

Human Rights Watch said that evidence from other sources, including the June 5, 2015, UN Commission of Inquiry report on Eritrea and recent Human Rights Watch interviews with Eritreans who left the country in 2014 and 2015, indicates there has been no change in the pattern of serious abuses in Eritrea.

“Until there is clear evidence, substantiated by international human rights investigators, that Eritrea has ended its abuse of national conscripts, the UK and other countries should base their policies on the best available independent evidence,” Simpson said. “That includes the words of Eritreans brave enough to speak out over Eritrea’s ongoing human rights crisis.”

For more Human Rights Watch reporting on Eritrea, please visit:
http://www.hrw.org/africa/eritrea

For more Human Rights Watch reporting on refugees, please visit:
http://www.hrw.org/topic/refugees

United Nations admits fault in Eritrea/North Korea plagiarism embarrassment

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has admitted making a error by publishing a letter on its official website from the Eritrean government containing two paragraphs copied from an earlier North Korean statement.

The letter was in response to a 484-page report of the council about Eritrea’s ”systematic and gross” human rights violations, which may amount to crimes against humanity.

The Eritrean mission called the report ”totally unfounded and devoid of all merit” and dismissed the accusations of human rights violations as ”a continuation and escalation of politically motivated campaign to undermine the political, economic and social progress the country is making”.

After accusing the US of setting up a ”human rights racket”, the letter included a statement with reference to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea:

”The moves of the hostile forces to dare provoke the socialist system of the DPRK which was chosen and has been consolidated by the Korean people will not be able to escape disgraceful doom.”

The human rights council spokesman Rolando Gomez told IBTimes UK that the reference to the North Korean dictatorship ”was indeed an error committed by the UN Secretariat in processing this Human Rights Council document”.

He added: ”The corrected version will be on-line soon.”

A quick search showed that the original statement was published in February by the DPRK spokesman for the foreign ministry in reference to a conference held in Washington about human rights violations in North Korea.

Eritrea and North Korea are the first and second most-censored countries according to a list compiled by the Committee to Protect Journalists.